nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
In case the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and carry on according for the law. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only performed In case the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
However it can be made distinct that police is free to choose action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused for the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also make certain respect on the family shed in accordance with legislation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Looking at the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has actually been reached. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated over. Read more
PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents in the boy or Female don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they will Lower off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that is a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
In a few jurisdictions, case legislation can be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is often a mandatory need in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation involves that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police get more info (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair into the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[4]
As being the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Criminal cases During the common legislation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil legislation systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions regular with the previous decisions of higher courts.